‘Hacks’ Square Off With ‘Flacks’ Over Federal Public Affairs Practices
August 14, 2013 | By Steven Ellis | firstname.lastname@example.org
Reporters and public affairs officers debated their roles Monday evening in the Club’s ballroom as part of a panel discussion entitled, “Are federal public affairs officers a help or hindrance to journalists?”
The Aug. 12 event, sponsored by the Club’s Press Freedom Committee and the Young Members Committee, gave NPC members and others in an audience of about 100 a first hand-look at concerns expressed by many journalists covering government agencies that some public affairs officers, or PAOs, have too much control over the flow of information available to the public.
Carolyn Carlson, a former Associated Press reporter, assistant professor of communication at Kennesaw State University in Georgia, and author of two surveys on the relationship between public affairs staff and the press, said her study showed that more than 40 percent of public affairs officers she interviewed admitted they “punish” reporters who they believe are biased.
Tony Fratto, managing partner at Hamilton Place Strategies and former principal deputy press secretary to President George W Bush said such practices “happen but shouldn’t.” Mr. Fratto said “the job of a public affairs officer is to facilitate the stream of information to the press, not curtail it,” but he acknowledged that there are some public affairs practitioners who are “not so good at what they do just as there are some bad reporters.”
John Verrico, president-elect of the National Association of Government Communicators, said many government employees are afraid that reporters will manipulate the information they are provided and that is one reason some agencies limit access to sources other than public affairs personnel. But, “in 22 years of working as a public affairs officer, I’ve experienced only about four times when reporters have intentionally misused information I’ve given them,” he said.
Linda Petersen, managing editor of The Valley Journals of Salt Lake, freedom of information chair of the Society of Professional Journalists and president of the Utah Foundation for Open Government, said that reporters will go around public affairs staffers if they feel they are being stonewalled.
Both Mr. Fratto and Mr. Verico acknowledge that practice, stressing they expect it.
“Sometimes, even with all of our efforts, the PAO blockades are just too effective,” Petersen said. “We can’t get through and even the best of us have to go with the official line and the scraps we can dig up. It’s not the complete story – it’s the best we can do. But sometimes, as we all know, the official story isn’t the real story.”
Kathryn Foxhall, a freelance reporter and member of the Press Freedom Committee, maintained that journalists are placed at a disadvantage when the only access they have is to public affairs officers.
“Subject expertise is very important to accurate and thorough reporting,” Foxhall said.
Both public affairs professionals agreed but said there are often security and market-sensitivity issues that govern press access beyond their offices.
John M. Donnelly, Press Freedom Committee Chair and senior writer with CQ Roll Call, moderated the panel.
“The net effect of these practices is a real deterrent to people speaking with the press outside of official channels--which often has to happen for the truth to come out, truth that Americans need to know about,” Donnelly said.
The panelists’ presentations can be read at http://paosandreporters.blogspot.com/
Video of the event: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkL1rR8znk4&feature=youtu.be
Contact: John M. Donnelly, Press Freedom Committee chairman: JDonnelly@cq.com